Medical tourism, compared on real evidence.
For patients weighing treatment abroad — from the US, UK, Canada, Australia and Western Europe — MedTraveling sits above every clinic, broker and aggregator, resolving conflicting data into one clear decision built on sourced evidence. We never sell rankings. We never sell your contact details.
20
Procedures mapped
245
Clinic dossiers
3
Destinations
0
Leads ever sold
Why MedTraveling exists
The medical-tourism web is built to capture you, not inform you.
We're not here to be angry about it — just to build a better model. Here is the structure we're correcting, stated plainly.
Everyone lists the same clinics
Most medical-tourism sites recycle an identical roster of clinics, doctors, and promises — because they draw from the same lead-broker feeds.
Rankings often follow commission
Many platforms are paid to route patients toward whoever pays the highest referral fee, not whoever is the strongest match for your case.
Your details become the product
Submit a form and your contact information is frequently sold to multiple providers. The 'free guide' was a lead-capture funnel.
Missing data is hidden, not flagged
Absent pricing, unnamed surgeons, and no outcome reporting are quietly omitted — when their absence is exactly what you needed to know.
The MedTraveling model: no lead resale, no pay-for-rank, no hidden funnels. We reward transparency by making it visible — and make opacity less effective by naming exactly what's missing.
How we make money →Procedure comparison
Compare destinations on evidence, side by side.
A live example: dental implants across the destinations where patients most often travel — with confidence shown, not hidden.
Price ranges reflect published provider figures with inclusions that vary — they are not quotes for your case. Open a destination for the clinic-by-clinic breakdown and what to verify.
Honest uncertainty
Every fact carries a confidence label.
We never blur verified records, patient opinions, and provider marketing into one number. Each claim is tagged — and incomplete data is treated as information, not silence.
Confirmed directly against an official registry, regulator, or primary issuing body.
Consistent across two or more independent sources, none of them the provider itself.
Drawn from patient reviews or self-reported experience. Subjective; not clinical outcome evidence.
Supplied by the provider and not yet independently verified. Shown separately from editorial data.
Insufficient public information to assess. The absence of data is itself a signal.
Sources disagree. We surface the conflict rather than silently picking one figure.
Clinic dossiers
Profiles that reveal tradeoffs — including the gaps.
A strong fertility centre, a heavily-marketed surgical hospital, and a thin-evidence package clinic. Notice how MedTraveling surfaces what's missing as clearly as what's verified.
Sani Dental Group
Los Algodones
Sani Dental Group is one of the largest and oldest dental clinics in Los Algodones, founded in 1985 by implantologist Dr. Enrique Jimenez. It operates a team of more than 40 dentists across multiple specialties with on-site dental laboratories and offers treatment warranties.
- Health Tourism Stamp
Memorial Sisli Hospital
Istanbul
Memorial Sisli Hospital, opened in 2000, was the first hospital in Turkey to receive JCI accreditation. Beyond general care, it is internationally recognized for its plastic surgery department and its IVF/ART center, whose laboratory was the first in Turkey accredited to the ISO 15189 medical laboratory standard.
- JCI
- ISO 15189
ID Hospital
Seoul
ID Hospital is one of South Korea's largest plastic surgery hospitals, located in the Gangnam area of Seoul and known internationally for facial bone contouring, two-jaw orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty. It operates a multilingual international patient department serving more than a dozen language groups.
- Ministry of Health and Welfare certification
- KHIDI recognition (facial bone contouring)
No account needed. Saved locally in your browser.
Evidence-first evaluation
Not one score. 12 explained dimensions, each sourced and dated.
A single rank hides the tradeoffs that actually matter. MedTraveling breaks every provider into independent dimensions — and tells you what each one measures, where it falls short, and how recently it was checked.
Transparency
How openly the provider publishes verifiable information.
Independent reputation
Strength and consistency of independent reputation signals.
Physician depth
Verifiable depth of the clinical team for the relevant specialty.
Specialty relevance
How focused the provider is on the specialty you are researching.
Pricing clarity
How clearly and completely prices are published.
Patient communication
Recurring themes in how the provider communicates with patients.
International patient support
Support for cross-border patients.
Technology & facilities
Verifiable facility and technology signals.
Accreditation & regulation
Recognised accreditation and clean regulatory signals.
Source coverage
How much independent public evidence exists at all.
Outcome reporting
Whether the provider reports outcomes at all.
Information consistency
Whether claims agree across the provider's own channels and third parties.
Where the evidence comes from
Sourced, weighted, and dated — official records outrank marketing.
MedTraveling pulls from official registries, regulators, professional bodies, research databases, government health sources, and independent reviews. Each source type carries a different weight, and patient reviews are never treated as clinical outcomes.
Official registry
Primary registries of accreditation, licensing, or incorporation.
Regulator
Government health authority or medical regulator.
Professional association
Specialty colleges and recognised professional bodies.
Research database
Peer-reviewed literature and indexed publication records.
Government health source
Public health system and ministry information.
Provider website
Marketing-controlled. Useful for claims, weak as evidence.
Independent review platform
Patient reviews. Shown with caveats; never treated as outcomes data.
News / investigative
Reputable reporting, weighted by outlet and documentation.
Provider submission
Claimed-profile submissions. Labeled and kept out of editorial scoring.
Research for hours. Never get captured as a lead.
The default outcome of a MedTraveling session is clarity — not a phone call from five clinics. Compare freely, save what matters, and walk into any conversation knowing exactly what to ask.