🇰🇷 Seoul, South Korea · est. 2015

CHA Fertility Center

CHA Fertility Center is the Seoul arm of the CHA medical group and is described as one of the largest IVF facilities in Asia. It offers advanced reproductive techniques including ICSI, IMSI and preimplantation genetic testing with dedicated international-patient support.

Fertility
Reproductive medicine

Researched & fact-checked by the MedTraveling editorial teamLast reviewed 21 June 20261 sourced referenceNo rankings or leads sold

Provider / aggregator

Known for

◆High-volume IVF
◆Preimplantation genetic screening

Accreditation & verification

Accreditation is facility-level and time-bound. Where a public registry exists, we link straight to it so you can confirm currency yourself.

Ministry of Health and Welfare certification

South Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare

Reported

Verify in the Türkiye Ministry of Health registry

Published prices

Provider-published figures. Not personalised quotes — confirm inclusions directly.

Provider	Published price (USD)	Typically includes	Source
IVF (In Vitro Fertilisation)	$5,400–$8,100	IVF cycle	Reported

What's in the package

Typically included

✓Surgery / procedure fee

Usually excluded

×Medications
×Flights

Procedures offered

IVF (In Vitro Fertilisation)

Languages

Korean · English

Sources

Every claim on this profile traces to a public source, with its confidence level.

CHA Fertility Center — Bookimed clinic profileCorroborated

About this profile. MedTraveling compiles this profile from public aggregator and provider sources, shown above with confidence labels. We do not sell rankings or leads, and inclusion is not an endorsement. Verify all clinical claims, accreditation currency and pricing directly with the provider before booking.

MedTraveling Transparency Index

53/ 100

Moderate transparency

Key signals present; some gaps remain to verify directly.

67% of checkable signals present

This is a transparency measure — how much about CHA Fertility Center is publicly checkable — not a clinical-quality verdict. Each dimension is explained, with its limitation.

Pricing transparency

Whether prices are published, with inclusions/exclusions and how many procedures are quoted. — Published ranges are not personalised quotes.

Clinician transparency

Whether named surgeons are listed and their society memberships disclosed. — A named, credentialed surgeon is not a measure of individual skill.

Accreditation & verifiability

Whether accreditation is held and traceable to a public verification registry. — Accreditation is facility-level and time-bound — confirm currency directly.

Independent evidence

Count and diversity of independent (non-provider) sources behind the profile. — Thin coverage lowers confidence — it is not a verdict on quality.

International support

Breadth of languages supported for cross-border patients. — Stated language support is not a guarantee of service.

Outcome reporting

Whether the provider publishes any outcome or complication data. — Almost no provider reports this — its absence is itself the signal.

Independent reputation

5.0/ 5

1 reviews on Bookimed

Reportedfew reviews — read with care

Patient opinion, not clinical outcome evidence — and deliberately kept out of the Transparency Index. We show the source so you can judge it yourself.

What's missing

Most platforms hide absent data. MedTraveling surfaces it — because what a provider does not disclose is often what you most need to know.

!No named surgeons
!No published outcome or complication data